Northern California Children's Therapy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680309705
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Woodland, CA, USA
Phone
5306681010
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,932,963
Expenses
$4,614,289
Assets
$2,301,704
Liabilities
$377,790

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTINA MICHEL-ALBERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTINA MICHEL-ALBERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $226,825 total reported compensation
  • DARSIE FISK (PHYSICAL THERAPIST): $124,505 total reported compensation
  • BROOKE SIMPSON (SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST): $116,349 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

No child should go through life with a disability that could be prevented through early intervention.

What it reported doing in 2024

Parent child+: parentchild+ (pc+) works to ensure that every child-regardless of race, income, or zip code-has equitable opportunities from the very beginning. Pc+ is built on the understanding that effective dropout prevention and long-term success start early, with parents and in the home. Today, early learning specialists who share strong community connections visit families with children ages 16-48 months twice a week, partnering with parents and caregivers to build early literacy, school readiness, and overall early opportunity. Through this consistent, relationship-based support, pc+ helps strengthen families and communities, working toward a future where all children start on a level playing field.tribal outreach: the tribal early education and outreach program (teeop) was created to address the significant gaps in early developmental screening, education, and intervention experienced by native american children ages 0-5-gaps that have only widened due to provider shortages, low screening rates, and the lasting impacts of the pandemic. As the only pediatric clinic in the region serving low-income and medi-cal-insured children, ctc launched this program to ensure that native families have access to culturally responsive developmental screenings, family education, individualized referrals, and advocacy. Staffed by experienced developmental specialists, teeop partners closely with tribal communities and regional agencies to identify developmental needs early, connect families with appropriate services, and elevate native voices in local and state systems-change efforts. This program plays a critical role in expanding equitable access to early education and intervention, strengthening family knowledge and confidence, and improving long-term outcomes for native children across our region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $72.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.