Northern California Center For Well-Being
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931144835
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Santa Rosa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7073386219
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,508,962
- Expenses
- $2,354,218
- Assets
- $3,616,113
- Liabilities
- $315,858
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gary Hochman (President)
- Surani Hayre-Kwan (Past President)
Highest reported compensation
- Karissa Moreno (Executive Dir.): $146,821 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health and well-being of our community through evidence-based health practices and innovative programs that advance health equity for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clinical Programs & Services:1.Medical Nutrition Therapy: The Center provides evidence-based self-management classes, proven to help individuals achieve improved clinical outcomes for those diagnosed with pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and/or chronic disease risk factors such as high BMI. These culturally-competent and bilingual health education classes teach families how to eat and live well, and successfully support patients on how to integrate behavioral changes and sustainable self-management practices that move the needle in health outcomes. Within a short timeframe, patients see tangible results in their biometric data, with improved blood glucose, lost pounds and lowered blood pressure. We achieve exceptional year over year clinical quality outcomes, measured by patient health metrics (such as HbA1c for patients with Type 2 Diabetes; weight lost and waist circumference for patients who are overweight or obese; and behaviors such as following a meal plan, measuring blood pressure regularly, and exercising at least 5 days a week).oTotal Program Expense: $600,048 (does not include management, administrative, or indirect costs)oFee for Service Revenue: $721,335 ($714,982 3rd party fees, $6,353 participantoTotal Number Served: 1370 unique patients2HeartWorks Cardiac Rehabilitation: The Centers cardiac rehabilitation program HeartWorks is a fully monitored, individualized exercise and education program that provides a solid foundation for cardiovascular rehabilitation through gradual, positive changes that supports patients in embracing new lifestyle patterns. Each client is guided by a multidisciplinary team of Physicians, Nurses, Registered Dietitians, and Exercise Physiologists who design a personalized exercise and diet plan and closely supervise each aspect of the clients rehabilitation. All activity is monitored, with assessments including EKG monitoring, blood pressure measurement, oxygen saturation, and healthy body weight tracking. Exercise training includes aerobic activity, stretching, strengthening, and balance exercises. Through the program, patients become more aware of their bodys capabilities and are able to receive biofeedback on their target heart rate and levels of exertion to support the attainment of their peak physical activity. Patient outcomes are improved strength, stamina, and confidence level.oTotal Program Expense: $587,082(does not include management, administrative, or indirect costs)oFee for Service Revenue: $296,057($290,057 3rd party fees, $6,192 participant fees)oTotal Number Served 504 unique patients Community-Based Programs & Services:3Community Programs: The Center is committed to advancing health equity in our community, and we are local leaders in providing the education, resources, support, and confidence for community members to thrive. Specific emphasis of our work includes populations at greatest risk for health disparities, including low-income, Latinx, and rural populations and we serve children to seniors. Our community-based programs fall under three main areas of focus: (1) Youth Programs (focused on the healthy development of youth through healthy lifestyles, resiliency and coping mechanisms, and peer-to-peer support), (2) Community Health Workers (focused on community engagement, education, and empowerment), and (3) Tobacco (focused on elevating community concerns and advocating for policy changes that create a healthier environment such as Tobacco Retail Licenses and Smoke-Free Multi-Unit Housing). oTotal Program Expense: $1,049,653 (please note this does not include management or administrative costs)oFee for Service Revenue: No Fee-for-Service Revenue all grant fundedoTotal Number Served Over 23,000 community members are directly or indirectly served through our community-based programs annually.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 95%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 95% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.