Northeastern Pennsylvania Diversity Education Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
233009715
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Scranton, PA, USA
Phone
5705583235
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,950
Expenses
$35,981
Assets
$165,124
Liabilities
$15,633

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAS WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KAS WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • THOMAS DUFFY PHD (SECRETARY)
  • CARL WITKOWSKI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to eliminate discrimination by providing a broad-based diversity regional teaching and learning environment to prepare students for a life in a multi-cultural, multi-racial diverse society by promoting and addressing faculty development, community outreach, multi-cultural programming, service learning and curriculum development.

What it reported doing in 2024

The northeastern Pennsylvania diversity education consortium developed and presented events to members of the consortium and the public during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025. These events included the following: navigating microaggressions: fostering inclusive spaces, 2025 advancing health care and delivery conference, breaking bias: building an inclusive workshop, 2025 lgbtqia+ education symposium, and participation in the wilkes university juneteenth celebration.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.9%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 35.8%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.59; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.9% of revenue deployed · 35.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.