Northeast Taiwan Christian Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352425869
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Americus, GA, USA
- Phone
- 2299247409
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $370,256
- Expenses
- $353,970
- Assets
- $588,778
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
NETCA is a ministry chiefly concerned with church-planting disciple-making and collaborating with any individual or group who shares or wishes to know the Good News of Jesus Christ: that one may be justified of sin sanctified in soul and ultimately glorified for eternity which we believe creates better traditions and brighter futures for the individual the family and the communities of northeastern Taiwan and the whole world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Outreach Camps and Tours Program OCT - NETCA hosts both regional and international camps and mission tours mostly in Taiwan and USA. These camps and tours include children teens young adults and seniors. In 2024 NETCA hosted a Galilee camp in Aodi and Dasi villages for grammar school children. NETCA also hosted a Shout Camp for teenagers in Long-Men Village for teenagers. All of these villages are in northeastern Taiwan. This year NETCA also hosted a mission tour to the USA that we call the Come Follow Me or CFM tour. Twenty-two older children and teenagers joined the mission tour to Boston Connecticut and New York while approximately 300 attended the aforementioned three summer camps. In the two Galilee camps the teaching focused on the miracles and parables of Jesus as laid out in the gospel of Mark chapters 1-9. They also engaged in singing songs playing games and doing crafts. These two camps were five days long for each camp and from 8:00 until 5pm. The Shout camp was hosted at a camp ground and the teens in attendance stayed in the camp for four days and three nights. They received teachings from the Bible sound praise and worship songs was served three meals per day engaged in surfing kayaking and other games. They slept in air-conditioned bunk houses and had use of public restrooms and showers and a large pavilion. Expenses included camp ground rental stage and sound equipment rental meals t-shirts prizes game supplies printed materials bank fees small stipends gifts and love offerings for guests speakers and some helpers kayak entry fees insurance teaching supplies postage non-edible consumables and other small disbursements. These two programs had expenses of $123,061.00 in 2024 and had revenue of $114,984.00 in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 43
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $90.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 59.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $303K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 41 current checks pass · 5 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX CompCurrentOfficersDirectors column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesAccounting column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.