Northeast Indiana Base Community Council Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453537037
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2603414795
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,333
- Expenses
- $125,433
- Assets
- $66,981
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Carl Huber (President)
People named in this filing
- Carl Huber (President)
- Lisa Mungovan (Secretary)
- Sarah Huber (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our vision is for Northeast Indiana to become America's most engaged military community. Our main focus is on education, collaboration, communication, and programs that will build, grow and enhance the quality of life in Northeast Indiana. A large part of our efforts go toward the Military Support Fund, held at the Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne, that provides monetary grants to local military service members for urgent living expenses. We raise money through donations and events such as our Race For The Warrior 5k Walk/Run/Roll and Golf For The Warrior golf tournament and Luncheon Series.
What it reported doing in 2025
Northeast Indiana Base Community Council is a not-for-profit private organization serving as a catalyst in unifying the military, civilian and business communities. See Schedule O.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.