Northeast Iaati Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843895305
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Mansfield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8572641916
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $91,178
- Expenses
- $41,287
- Assets
- $94,670
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIM M HORMANN (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL LEDOUX (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- DOUG KILLIAN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- GEORGE RIPLEY (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
- DENNIS GOODHART (CLERK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- GREG O'CONNOR (4TH VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIM M HORMANN (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL LEDOUX (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- DOUG KILLIAN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Established to unite for mutual benefit, law enforcement members and similar industry professionals, in order to provide for exchange of technical information and developments with regard to vehicle crimes, via educational meetings and seminars. To encourage high professional standards of conduct among auto theft investigators and to continually strive to eliminate all factors which interfere with administration of crime suppression.
What it reported doing in 2024
Annual seminar intended to provide extensive training to law enforcement and anti-fraud professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.6%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -49.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 71.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.6% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.