Northeast Hydrogen Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521834685
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 5097682249
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $10,141
- Assets
- $1,141
- Liabilities
- $1,141
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- SHARON ANNETT (Exec Director)
- KATHI EPPING MARTIN (Director)
- DR ELVIN YUZUGULLU (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educating the public and policymakers on technological solutions to reduce climate change emissions and air pollution, improve energy resiliency, and bring energy and environmental solutions to underserved communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
- Assisted organizations in preparing proposals for government funding to advance hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.- Assisted companies in networking to build business relationships, and educated policymakers and the public on hydrogen and fuel cell techhnology status / benefits.- Donated funds to Navajo Technical University to educate college students in hydrogen and fuel cell technologies to better help prepare the workforce of the future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -23.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.