Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823382624
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Humble, TX, USA
Phone
7134492691
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$678,010
Expenses
$190,200
Assets
$709,625
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Huey Wilson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kenneth Williams (Treasurer)
  • Keith Downey (Secretary)
  • Huey Wilson (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Is to act as the platform for engaging collaborative solutions that produce economic development, equitable education and citizen's empowerment solutions that directly benefit the historically underserved communities of Northeast Houston.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council focuses on these primary areas: Food insecurity Educational equity Community infrastructure and environment Food Insecurity NEHRC spent $26,000 to support the operation of Northeast Community Farmers Market which provides SNAP and Double Up benefits to residents. The organization spent more than $5,000 on community and residential gardening operations. NEHRC donated $2,000 to sponsor a fresh produce market for Students at Texas Southern University. NEHRC donated periodically during 2025 to 8 local food pantry operations. Education Equity In the area of education, NEHRC has donated $21,000 to 21 graduates of Kashmere High School in 2025. NEHRC donated more than $11,000 to wraparound services in seven schools of the Kashmere feeder pattern throughout the year. We also collaborated with United In Service Coalition to sponsor a Twelve Days of Christmas celebration for five Elementary schools. NEHRC also donated $1,000 to the Tampons for Students Initiative. NEHRC donated $1,500 to sponsor drone training by United In Service Coalition for a student STEM event centered on illegal dumping in collaboration with the Urban Enrichment Institute. NEHRC also spent another $1,000 on food for the event. Community Infrastructure NEHRC spent $350,000 to purchase a former elementary school building to be converted to a community center and resilience hub for northeast Houston communities. NEHRC spent approximately $10,000 for directors to attend various environmental justice workshops, conferences and trainings. NEHRC works closely with the Bullard Center for Environmental Justice at Texas Southern University to address environmental issues in northeast Houston. Summary The Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council has directly served approximately 10,000 residents in 2025 and affected many more indirectly with the scope and breadth of our initiatives and community engagement. NEHRC spent more than $5,000 on community engagement events and celebrations such as Resilience Fest and Juneteenth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 28
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.9%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 56.7%; rating input score 57
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.9% of revenue deployed · 56.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.