Northeast Disaster Recovery Information X-Change Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043230566
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Cranston, RI, USA
Phone
7818443328
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,382
Expenses
$55,751
Assets
$81,777

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Timothy Patterson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Timothy Patterson (President)
  • Rose Schofield (Secretary)
  • Renee Garrahan (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop techniques and equipment for protection or recovery of business information threatened or damaged by natural or man made disasters.

What it reported doing in 2018

With over 1800 members, NEDRIX provides continuity and crisis management professionals access to real time governmental agencies information during a crisis or event. This is accomplished through our Public/Private Sector(PPC) Directive and our automated notification tool, NEDRIX Notify. NEDRIX also provides industry best practices and an opportunity to meet and share ideas and experiences with peers through conferences and symposiums held throughout the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 9

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -935.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 71%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.3% of revenue deployed · 8.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.