Northeast Association of Advisors for the Health Professions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222535481
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Emmaus, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7173951137
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,422
- Expenses
- $14,833
- Assets
- $288,136
- Liabilities
- $364
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SETH RAMUS (President 23-24,DIRECTOR 24-25)
- PATRICIA KREKE (DIRECTOR 23-24,President 24-25)
- Jason D'Antonio (President ELECT 2023-2024)
- ALEX TAN Director 2023- (2024, President ELECT 2024-2025)
- ELIZABETH BROOKINS (Past President 2023-2025)
People named in this filing
- SETH RAMUS (President 23-24,DIRECTOR 24-25)
- PATRICIA KREKE (DIRECTOR 23-24,President 24-25)
- Jason D'Antonio (President ELECT 2023-2024)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the association is educational. Northeast association of advisors for the health professions neaahp seeks to advance undergraduate advising for the health professions and serve as a resource for advisors who guide students preparing for a career in the health professions, to further these goals, neaahp will disseminate information regarding the health professions to advisors, facilitate continued communication among advisors within the region and between the advisor community and health professions schools and organizations, sponsor educational meetings and promote the professional identity of advisors for the health professions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advance undergraduate advising for the health professions and serve as a resource for advisors who guide students preparing for a career in the health professions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.8%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 56.2%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.43; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.8% of revenue deployed · 56.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.