Northbay Healthcare Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942995085
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fairfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7076463138
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,998,721
- Expenses
- $2,419,527
- Assets
- $14,951,398
- Liabilities
- $118,964
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BEHL (DIRECTOR / PRES & CEO NBHC)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK BEHL (DIRECTOR / PRES & CEO NBHC): $1,240,326 total reported compensation
- JOSPH D'ANGINA (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $1,009,593 total reported compensation
- PAUL MCGINTY (SVP, CHIEF PHIL OFFICER / PRES NBHF): $672,769 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire community partnership through philanthropic giving to support northbay health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Northbay healthcare foundation's purpose is to support northbay health by providing and managing fundraising services, and the development thereof. The organization holds various fundraising events, including the jubilee. All funds raised during these events and other generous contributions received throughout the year helped support the charitable purposes of the northbay health's affiliated entities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.3%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 32
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.18; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.3% of revenue deployed · 31.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $763K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.