Northampton Township Business and Technology Center Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462796152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Ivyland, PA, USA
Phone
2153570892
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Expenses
$562
Assets
$20,996
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRETT KENDALL (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT NIERADKA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRETT KENDALL (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT NIERADKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • THOMAS GONSIEWSKI (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To operate an association of business located in the four industrial parks along jacksonville road in northampton township for the purpose of: securing local resources for materials, products, services and talents.modernize the appearance and atmosphere of the industrial park in an effort to imporve and preserve competitive advantage over competing locations.advance intra-park commerce by promoting the expertise of neighboring businesses and endorsing "buy local" initiatives.cultivate an all-emcompassing business network with solid partnerships thoroughout the indrustiral park, township, county, state, country and the world.reduce expenses for members through the consolidation of needs and volume purchasing power, such as snow removal, landscaping, recycling, etc.

What it reported doing in 2021

Organized the association, elected officers and started gathering support for the organization and planning to improve visibility of the technology park

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 37.36; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.