North Topsail Elementary School PTA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562113120
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Hampstead, NC, USA
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,012
Expenses
$71,482
Assets
$10,495

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rona Levin (President)
  • Blair Grapner (Co Vice President)
  • Karen Boone (Co Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rona Levin (President)
  • Blair Grapner (Co Vice President)
  • Karen Boone (Co Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and supplement the educational programs and activities of North Topsail Elementary School and promote the welfare of children in the school and community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The PTA provided comprehensive support to enhance the educational experience at North Topsail Elementary School. This included $32,067 in general school support funding for educational materials equipment and programs; $5,224 in teacher mini-grants enabling teachers to purchase classroom supplies and enrichment materials through direct PTA purchases; support for student participation in academic enrichment programs including Science Olympiad $710 Battle of the Books $262 and All County Chorus $363; funding for student leadership development programs including Safety Team $148 News Crew $257 Yearbook Team $224 and Climate Committee $299; and $2,128 for the Holt Wellness program promoting student health and wellness. These programs directly furthered the organizations educational mission by providing resources and opportunities that supplemented the schools curriculum and enhanced student learning.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $93K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.