North Texas Region USA Volleyball
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200823871
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Allen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4693261873
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Olympics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,102,059
- Expenses
- $838,350
- Assets
- $2,512,540
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Steve Carrera (Executive Director)
- Andy Reitinger (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Steve Carrera (Executive Director): $109,867 total reported compensation
- Linda Harris (Game Day Operations): $45,917 total reported compensation
- Penny Rodgers (Member Services Manager): $45,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Further the Sport of Volleyball
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.7%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 46
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.9%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.7% of revenue deployed · 46.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 14 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $386K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.