North Texas Dream Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461234510
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $23,647
- Assets
- $48,543
- Liabilities
- $15,275
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANGELICA ANDRADE (EMPLOYEE)
- JOE POSADA (TREASURER)
- SANDRA AVALOS (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Action and advocacy for daca
What it reported doing in 2021
DACA CLINICS AND WORKSHOPS Provided in schools, churches and community to educate and advance program awareness
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 31.3%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.5% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.