North Texas Dental Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562444266
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Farmersville, TX, USA
Phone
4698559965
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,337
Expenses
$104,724
Assets
$166,520
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA MCLERRAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • STEPHEN CHAN (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ALICIA GRAY (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • YERI GUAK (PRESIDENT)
  • HENRY LIAO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JERRY HOPSON (DIRECTOR)
  • LAVI RUDRAPATNA (BOARD MEMBER/DIRECTOR)
  • POORIA FALLAH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Continuing education, recruitment, and dental care for dentists

What it reported doing in 2025

Retention and recruitment for active and non-active dentists and students in north Texas benefiting over 800 dentists and future dentists

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.3%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 19.2%; rating input score 19

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 44%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.3% of revenue deployed · 19.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.