North Shore Tennis and Fitness
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472260674
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Southwest Harbor, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2072447854
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Racquet Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $86,710
- Expenses
- $64,982
- Assets
- $104,621
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN JOCK WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN JOCK WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- JASON ALLEN (TREASURER/SE)
- JAIME WEIR (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance the physical and mental health of the greater mount desert island community through tennis, fitness and music. The organization continues to focus on fundraising for the groundwork for a physical location which will include indoor tennis courts and fitness activities.
What it reported doing in 2017
To enhance the physical and mental health of the greater mdi community through tennis, fitness and music. Currently the organization is focused on fundraising for the facility which will include indoor tennis courts and fitness activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.4%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 44.5%; rating input score 45
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -28.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.4% of revenue deployed · 44.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.