North Shore Evp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474343431
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Hanapepe, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8083438196
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rural Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $542,331
- Expenses
- $446,706
- Assets
- $153,289
- Liabilities
- $21,544
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MELISSA RHODEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MELISSA RHODEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $79,931 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
North nbsp; shore nbsp; evp nbsp; is nbsp; a nbsp; community nbsp; based nbsp; economic nbsp; development nbsp; organization nbsp; focused nbsp; on nbsp; creating nbsp; new nbsp; jobs nbsp; and nbsp; economic nbsp; growth nbsp; on nbsp; the nbsp; north nbsp; shore nbsp; of nbsp; oahu
What it reported doing in 2024
Usda nifa 22 - this 2-year grant awarded in september 2022 focuses on delivery of food safety education and outreach programs to support Hawaii s farmers. The project provides customized outreach such as on-farm or on-site training and technical assistance that addresses knowledge and resource gaps.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 76%; rating input score 76; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $424K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.