North Seattle Community College Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911163554
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2063748844
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Financial Counseling

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,442,967
Expenses
$6,817,540
Assets
$25,460,641
Liabilities
$3,400,180

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CINDY SEREMEK (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CINDY SEREMEK (PRESIDENT): $281,132 total reported compensation
  • JESSICA WILLIAMS-OESTMANN (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $196,600 total reported compensation
  • REBECCA HOUSE (DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC INITIATIVES): $177,519 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The north seattle community college foundation (the foundation) operates exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1954, as amended. - see schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Consumer credit counseling: the foundation's consumer credit counseling program provides confidential, individualized financial counseling and education to financially distressed individuals. In fy2025, certified counselors assisted over 14,800 clients in managing personal finances and identifying solutions for debt repayment. All counseling and educational services are provided at no charge. Net revenues are available at the discretion of the board to further the foundation's financial aid and programmatic support of the college. Debt management plans: american financial solutions (afs) helps clients free themselves from the anxiety and stress of credit, debt, and financial worries by providing credit counseling, financial education, and debt management services that put clients in control of their financial success. Clients struggling with unsecured debt may enroll in a debt management plan (dmp), consolidating multiple debts into a single monthly payment tailored to the client's budget. Fees for dmp enrollment are regulated and waived in cases of financial hardship. During the fiscal year, 7,150 dmps were initiated, and 2,250 clients successfully completed their plans, collectively repaying over $21 million in debt. Total client debt repayment for the year exceeded $119 million. Home foreclosure counseling: as a sub-grantee of the Washington state housing finance commission and a hud-approved agency, afs provided foreclosure prevention counseling to over 600 clients. Counselors worked directly with clients and lenders to identify solutions, resulting in 222 families maintaining homeownership. All services were delivered confidentially and at no cost to the client. Homebuyer counseling: afs assisted 75 clients in preparing for homeownership by evaluating financial readiness, educating on the lending process, and reviewing loan documents. Twenty clients successfully purchased homes during the fiscal year. Bankruptcy counseling and education: certified counselors provided pre-bankruptcy assessments and post-bankruptcy financial education in compliance with federal requirements. Approximately 90 clients received pre-bankruptcy counseling, and 33 completed post-bankruptcy education. Student loan counseling afs delivered tailored counseling to over 100 individuals seeking assistance with student loan management. The program also offered educational resources to employers and employees, including on-site classes and individual counseling.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $281K · 15 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $895K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.