North Rock Medication Clinic Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830346190
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4058582700
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Reported finances

Revenue
$362,944
Expenses
$454,266
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHILLIP RANDY TATE LCSW (PRESIDENT)
  • VERNA FOUST (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PHILLIP RANDY TATE LCSW (PRESIDENT)
  • LONNIE RICE (TREASURER)
  • RICHARD PRALLE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purposes of the psychiatric services provided at north rock medication clinic are to evaluate each consumer's mental status, provide and/or participate in comprehensive treatment planning, and, as needed, prescribe medications to reduce symptoms, maximize functioning and promote stability for community living. To provide community mental health outpatient services to persons in need.

What it reported doing in 2016

North rock medication clinic, inc., a collaborative effort between northcare and red rock behavioral health services, provides psychiatric evaluations and a medication clinic. Scheduled appointments are available monday - friday. Additionally a in clinic" is scheduled every wednesday beginning at 4:00 p.m. For consumers who missed the current month's appointment. North rock medication clinic services are limited to those consumers of northcare and red rock behavioral health services. The consumer is seen by the psychiatrist or physician assistant and can have medications filled at the pharmacy during their scheduled appointment and at one location. Effective april 19, 2016, the clinic board voted to dissolve the operations of the clinic with the operations of the clinic anticipated to be ceased as of the end of october 2016.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $424K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.