North Mountain Counseling

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991454789
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
4802502786
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,264
Expenses
$80,076
Assets
$87,805

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Andrew Stravitz (Executive Dir.)
  • Jason Dailey (Treasurer)
  • Christopher Keck (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

North Mountain Counseling's mission is to provide subsidized clinical mental health services through clinically trained persons both in office and on contracted sites, as well as consulting services to the end of addressing accessibility of mental health services for at-risk populations.

What it reported doing in 2025

North Mountain Counseling subsidized 373 direct client sessions, making long-term therapeutic care accessible for approximately 48 families and individuals in financial hardship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.