North-missoula Community Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810509941
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Missoula, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4068290873
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,812,418
- Expenses
- $514,555
- Assets
- $6,490,022
- Liabilities
- $39,957
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CORTNEY PERRETEN (PRESIDENT)
- PAM WALZER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- BRITTANY PALMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRITTANY PALMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,654 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Building community power, thriving neighborhoods and affordable homes
What it reported doing in 2024
Hill and homestead preservation coalition. In a cooperative management agreement with the city of missoula, nmcdc focuses on open space, historic and environmental preservation of missoula's north hills, also known as the moon-randolph homestead. The homestead is on the national register of historic places. The homestead represents both homestead era settlement patterns on indigeneous lands and hard scrabble truck farm production of the 20th century-a demonstration of how missoula fed itself. Missoula outdoor cinema. Missoula outdoor cinema free or low cost (donations are accepted) cinema to the play-field next to the northside's old whittier school, now project head start, the project has provided weekend evening entertainment throughout the summer months since 2003. Admission is free with voluntary contributions. Movies are projected on a screen hung on the side of the building.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.5%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 81.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.61; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.5% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $398K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.