North Miami Beach Eruv Council Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932980502
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- North Miami Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3058340121
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,186
- Expenses
- $49,398
- Assets
- $37,654
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHIMSHON MINDICK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHIMSHON MINDICK (PRESIDENT)
- ISAAC SAPOZNIK (SECRETARY)
- MICHAEL SINGER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote, establish, erect, maintain and supervise an "eruv" for north miami beach, Florida in accordance with orthodox jewish law, custom and tradition, as set forth in the shulchan aruch, and defined therein as a particular structure constructed in accordance with religious law, the use of which enables observance of orthodox jewish law. The purpose of said eruv shall be to support and enhance the general welfare, harmonious communal life, observance and worship of and by members of the north miami beach community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Supervised and monitored the improvements to the eruv. Continual checking and maintaining the eruv making sure that the eruv complies with orthodoz jewish law according to the shulchan aruch, the code of jewish law.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 67.4%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -55.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -86% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.9% of revenue deployed · 67.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.