North Jersey Siberian Husky Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
384336132
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$-1,040
Expenses
$823
Assets
$11,014

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ruth Hanningsten (President)

People named in this filing

  • Ruth Hanningsten (President)
  • Jeff Bender (Treasurer)
  • Elaine Barone (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The club provides information and programs to highlight the attributes and history of the Siberian Husky breed encourages members to enter dog shows agility competitions and attend events to demonstrate the breeds attributes. We also assist in adoption and cruelty prevention. In 2024 the club had an eye clinic which hosted 48 dogs whose eyes were examined by a licensed vetinarian. We raised 2,900 for the club and had expenses of 1,995 for vet services and 100 for renting the local 4-H facility. In January we exhibited our dogs at the Grand Cascade Lodge where the lodge guests interacted with the dogs and also performed a dog sled demonstration. We raised 350 for the day. Also the members receive bragging rights for accomplishments in show agility rally competitions. There are no monetary rewards. Club meetings are held once a month to discuss finances membership and future activities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Eye Clinic 74 dogs examined 3700 received vs expenses of 5120 which includes two payments to the Dr. Holmberg the vet providing the exams which includes both 24 and 25 fees. Demonstration and dog sled exhibit at cascade Lodge for 350

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -179.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.38; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2,057.1% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.