North Houston Catholic High School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263051354
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Spring, TX, USA
Phone
8326163217
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,516,686
Expenses
$8,740,447
Assets
$24,765,623
Liabilities
$10,216,684

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATT REGITZ (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RYAN JANISE (DIRECTOR OF IT): $117,284 total reported compensation
  • ALISSA REYNOLDS (DEAN OF ACADEMICS): $108,359 total reported compensation
  • TIMOTHY LIENHARD (DIRECTOR OF ADVANCEMENT AND ENROLLMENT): $102,225 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The goal of frassati catholic high school is for every person involved with the high school-faculty, staff, parents, students, benefactors, and friends- to know the happiness for which god has created them. True happiness is found only when we act in accord with our god-given human nature; in other words, we are happy when we are doing what we were created to do. "the beatitudes are the paradoxical promises that sustain hope," helping us to navigate through the sufferings of this life and to entrust our happiness to god rather than try to create it ourselves on our own terms (catechism of the catholic church 1717). At frassati catholic high school, we aim to prepare our students to walk on the path of true happiness as men and women of the beatitudes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Athletics - the school offers the following sports programs: cross country, football, boys and girls volleyball, boys and girls basketball, boys and girls soccer, swimming, cheerleading, golf, baseball, softball, tennis, track and field.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 64% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $47.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.83; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 12 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.