North Fulton Community Charities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581521088
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roswell, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7706400399
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,856,821
- Expenses
- $14,261,643
- Assets
- $12,439,623
- Liabilities
- $289,461
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TED SCHWARTZ (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MATT POWELL (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
- SANDRA HOLIDAY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA HOLIDAY (PRESIDENT): $133,145 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nfcc's mission is to help ease hardship and foster financial stability in our community. Our programs and services help prevent homeless and hunger for thousands of families each year. Programs and services include: financial assistance for housing & utlities; food pantry; clothing; seasonal support - back to school, warm coat, thanksgiving food, and toy for the holidays; educational programs - ged, esl, budgeting, job and financial coaching.
What it reported doing in 2024
The nfcc mission allows us to extend beyond the immediate need or that moment in crisis that any of us could experience by looking to the medium and long term needs of our families through improving skills in language, education and job training. In the calendar year of 2024, we enrolled 515 students in our esl (english as second language) program. This five level program is available to all at our facility and other satellite locations. Our education program provided 10 students last year with their ged with 73 others working through the curriculum. Our workforce development program provides coaching and job skills to new, current or someone returning to the job market through improving resumes, job hunting strategies, interviewing techniques and by taking advantage of our computer training classroom for ms office training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $56.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $13.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.