North End Community Improvement Collaborative Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205806276
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mansfield, OH, USA
Phone
4195253101
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,663,515
Expenses
$2,844,198
Assets
$808,099
Liabilities
$349,259

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHIL MAZZOCCO (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW SCRUGGS (CEO)
  • DEANNA TORRENCE (PAST CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEANNA TORRENCE (PAST CEO): $96,909 total reported compensation
  • MATTHEW SCRUGGS (CEO): $10,777 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the quality of life and economic landscape of mansfield's north end.

What it reported doing in 2024

Guided by a resident-driven community economic development plan approved in 2011 and updated in 2017 by mansfield city council, necic's mission is to improve the quality of life and economic landscape for residents living in census tracts 6 & 7, and 16 in mansfield, richland county, Ohio. The plan focuses on health and safety; public infrastructure and transit, community spaces and land use; education; economic and workforce development and housing. Through transformative organizing, convening and leadership development, necic coordinates and supports community gardens throughout richland county and hosts a weekly north end farmer's market from june- october; operates a 12-acre urban farm hosting its own and two north end resident/s microfarms onsite; conducts microbusiness development training and a microlending program. Necic supports minority leadership and business development efforts and is the local subsite of the minority business assistance center. The organization is the convener of the african american leadership initiative and mansfield's my brother's keeper program. Since 2016, necic has also operated an alternative temporary staffing agency (temp2higher) with community health worker supportive services for low income job seekers and temporary employees. Necic hosts americorps vistas and interns annually, and supports its beautification and food access efforts by operating a community tool lending library and hosting gardening and related educational classes at its blust avenue teaching garden. In direct support of north end residents, necic distributes small grants and community garden grants and provides various neighborhood based activities such as its annual 60/60 clean-up with north end residents including youth, adults, job seekers, and elders. Grounded in asset based community development and utilizing bridges out of poverty principles, necic also conducts housing development and economic studies and/or assessments, regularly collaborates with a diverse array of private and public sector partners to advance the community's plan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -71%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.