North Delta Youth Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
640849178
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Lambert, MS, USA
Phone
6623265107
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,047
Expenses
$55,386
Assets
$17,326
Liabilities
$2,848

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT JAMISON (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • HARVEY SPIKES (CHAIRMAN)
  • OTHA HENSON (VICE CHAIRMA)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the lives and conditions of children, to provide assistance in the areas of health and educaton, to arrive at an acheivement level of success and self esteem and allow them to contribute back to their community and nation.

What it reported doing in 2013

North delta youth center is a community based organization that operates as an affliate of childfund, a 501(c)(3) organization that works with other tax-exempt organizations around the world to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to improve their lives and the opportunity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change in their communities. Sponsorship payments granted by childfund are distributed to individual children who meet eligibility requirements. Various programs are held throughout the year to provide opportunities for the children to interact, learn, and bring positive change to their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.