North Dakota Veterinary Medical Assoc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450340520
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Bismarck, ND, USA
Phone
7012217740
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,665
Expenses
$155,843
Assets
$412,687
Liabilities
$2,858

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR HEATHER MITCHELL (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DR BLEAUX JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR ANDREA SAND (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DR KELLY SCHAEFER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PAT ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DR HEATHER MITCHELL (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DR BLEAUX JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR ANDREA SAND (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ndvma serves to advance the veterinary profession through provision of continuing education and advocacy of public policy and legislation pertinent to the veterinary profession

What it reported doing in 2025

Conferences are conducted to educate and increase knowledge of members and to promote the veterinary profession.classes for a total of 18 hours continuing education were offerred to the registrants. The state board of veterinary medicalexaminers requires licensed veterinarians to obtain 24 hours of continuing education in a two year cycle.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.4%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.