North Dakota Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Assn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450461077
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bismarck, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7012583022
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,402
- Expenses
- $84,509
- Assets
- $102,927
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD BERGER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LORELL JUNGLING (EXECUTIVE DI)
- AIMEE COPAS (CO EXEC DIRE)
- CHAD BERGER (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote high standards of achievement and ethics in interscholastic and extracurricular activity; to promote better public relations and sportsmanship between schools; to provide for an exchange of ideas and better understanding of the administration of high school activities, goodwill and fellowship among the athletic administrators of the state; to promote the professional growth and image of interscholastic athletic administrators
What it reported doing in 2024
Sponsored educational & informational conventions, conferences, seminars & meetings for the educational development of members. Recognizes membership through a tiered awards process and conducts and funds through sponsorships, a scholarship program for students and athletic administrators.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.3%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.