North Dakota Hereford Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450343680
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New Salem, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7014008744
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,043
- Expenses
- $16,891
- Assets
- $18,683
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dan Donnelly (president)
- Walter Jones (vice president)
People named in this filing
- Dan Donnelly (president)
- Walter Jones (vice president)
- Joana K Friesz (secretary treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization promotes the Hereford cattle breed for North Dakota Hereford Assn members and promotes the breed thru assisting junior members in junior activity sponsorship, advertise in livestock newspapers, website, directory and cattle magazines. The organization organizes a breed sale for the benefit of their members to promote the Hereford breed. The organization is self funded by its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
This organization promotes the Hereford cattle breed for North Dakota Hereford Assn members and promotes the breed to their junior members - advertises in cattle newspapers, website, directory and cattle magazines. The organization organizes a breed sale each year for the benefit of their members to promote their Hereford cattle.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.1%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.1% of revenue deployed · 47.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.