North Coast Cancer Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260270967
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Sandusky, OH, USA
Phone
4196269097
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health

Reported finances

Expenses
$40,041
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN R MURPHY (PRESIDENT &)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN R MURPHY (PRESIDENT &)
  • ALLEN NICKLES (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DAVID COTE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

North coast cancer foundation is dedicated to enhancing the lives of all people affected by cancer and provides: financial support for uninsured and underinsured cancer patients; complementary care programs, including art therapy, therapeutic yoga and cancer support groups, which are offered at no cost to cancer patients and family members; education for patients, survivors, caregivers, our community and healthcare professionals, including an annual breast cancer conference each fall; and research opportunities to improve patients' outcomes.

What it reported doing in 2015

Treatment and financial assistance. Awarded grants to uninsured and underinsured cancer patients to cover patient balance for radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and follow-up visits. Awarded grants to cancer patients for transportation and living expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.