North Central Sociological Association C/o Anjel Stough-hunter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237292737
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Galena, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7249843050
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,699
- Expenses
- $58,518
- Assets
- $172,827
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LESLIE WANGE (PRESIDENT)
- BARBARA JONES DENISON (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
- GEOFF WOODS (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GAIL MCGUIRE (VICE PRESIDENT - ELECT)
People named in this filing
- LESLIE WANGE (PRESIDENT)
- BARBARA JONES DENISON (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
- GEOFF WOODS (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To further the development of sociology as a scientific and scholarly discipline through: (a) scientific research in its defined subject matter area (b) effective teaching of the subject matter at all levels of education (c) interchange and cooperative relations among persons and organizations engaged in the scientific study of society and (d) any other acts deemed conducive to these ends.
What it reported doing in 2024
Quarterly journal "sociological focus" regional area: in, southern and eastern il, ky, mi, oh, ontario, western pa, and wv
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.7%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.95; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.7% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.