North Central Health Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311118357
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
West Lafayette, IN, USA
Phone
7654231604
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,689,115
Expenses
$28,273,033
Assets
$539,641,767
Liabilities
$23,107,684

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE LONG (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEPHANIE LONG (PRESIDENT/CEO): $464,970 total reported compensation
  • JAMIE SEGO (CFO): $270,419 total reported compensation
  • MICHELLE KREINBROOK (GRANTS DIRECTOR): $198,154 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is committed to advancing and providing health care for the benefit of the citizens of its eight county service area. Continue on schedule o: through the support of technological and scientific advancement, education, quality of life, and humanitarian community services, nchs will strive to promote a healthy community for all area residents.

What it reported doing in 2024

River bend hospital is a licensed inpatient psychiatric hospital providing acute inpatient psychiatric care to the adult population of mid-north Indiana. Care is provided without charge or at amounts less than established rates to patients who meet certain criteria under the hospital's charity care policy. Because the organization does not collect amounts deemed to be charity care, the amounts are not reported as revenue. Of the organization's total health care services expense reported, an estimated $753,000 (at cost) arose from providing services to charity patients during the year ended december 31, 2024. [continued on schedule o]the estimated costs of providing charity services are based on a calculation which applies a ratio of costs to charges to the gross uncompensated charges associated with providing care to charity patients. The ratio of cost to charges, calculated using the IRS guidelines, is 7% for the year ended december 31, 2024.in 2014, the state of Indiana implemented hip 2.0 which expanded the existing medicaid program. As a result of this expansion, a greater number of patients qualified for hip 2.0 which reduced significantly the organization charity care and bad debt expense in the years since the expansion.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -267.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.09; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $465K · 12 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $9M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.