North Carolina Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561271757
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
Phone
9198333836
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,934
Expenses
$143,412
Assets
$122,103
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • W ALAN SKIPPER CAE (SENIOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY NEWTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTOPHER TEBBIT MD (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN THORP MD (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
  • BRENDAN O'CONNELL MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ELLIE KIELL MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • W ALAN SKIPPER CAE (SENIOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY NEWTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTOPHER TEBBIT MD (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and advance the science and art of medicine pertaining to the head, neck, ear, nose and throat.

What it reported doing in 2024

The annual meeting of the nc society of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery, inc. Serves to further the practice and research of otolaryngology. On occasion, the organization makes contributions to other tax-exempt organizations, and officers attend events hosted by the national chapter. At the annual meeting, prizes and awards are given to some attendees. Grants have been given to universities to help cover the cost of residents attending the annual meeting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.