North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581798953
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Durham, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9198810707
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,956,123
- Expenses
- $2,435,483
- Assets
- $976,865
- Liabilities
- $239,454
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SAMUEL GUNTER (EXECUTIVE DI): $144,915 total reported compensation
- STACIE DARDEN (DEPUTY DIREC): $129,328 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the North Carolina housing coalition is to lead a movement to ensure that every north carolinian has a home in which to live with dignity and opportunity. The coalition meets its mission by convening, resourcing, and mobilizing affordable housing professionals, communities impacted by a lack of affordability, and the broader public to pursue policies at the local, state, and federal levels that improve the supply, quality, and access of affordable housing in North Carolina.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community justice collaborative: the community justice collaborative (cjc) is a triangle-region initiative incubated by the nc housing coalition. The primary purpose of the collaborative is to support and connect community-led efforts in historically black communities to prevent the displacement of long-term neighbors and to enable affordable and equitable housing development, provide ample opportunities for power building across the region. Working in and with a dozen historically black neighborhoods, the cjc will help mobilize community development strategies, real estate tools, and data analysis to further community self-determination, increase racial equity, and retain lower-income long-term black residents who have built and sustained our communities. North Carolina tenants union (nctu): on march 15, 2024, the coalition (the "sponsor") entered into a fiscal sponsorship agreement with the North Carolina tenants union (the "project"). Under this agreement, the sponsor provides fiscal sponsorship services, including receiving grants, tax deductible contributions, and other revenues on behalf of the project. The sponsor is also responsible for maintaining financial oversight, disbursing funds and processing payroll for the project's activities in accordance with the terms outlined in the agreement. The agreement includes an administrative fee of 6.5% of the project's gross revenue, applied to donations and grants received by the sponsor on the project's behalf. Additionally, the sponsor agrees to provide certain employee benefits and administrative support to project staff. This agreement is expected to remain in effect until the project has established and confirmed independent 501(c)3 legal status and the parties agree to termination in writing, unless sooner terminated by the parties as outlined in the agreement. The agreement terminated on april 30, 2025, upon the agency's designation as an independent 501(c)(3).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.