North Carolina Home Builders Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 560891671
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Raleigh, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9198334613
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,521,409
- Expenses
- $4,509,232
- Assets
- $7,603,701
- Liabilities
- $819,144
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
109 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALAN BANKS (NCHBA PAST PRESIDENT)
- ANDI DIRKSCHNEIDER-BLISS (NCPWB PRESIDENT)
- BILL DALEURE (NCHBA PAST PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON BRYANT (NCHBA PAST PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN PACE (NCHBA PAST PRESIDENT)
- BUDDY HUGHES (NCHBA PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TIM MINTON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $490,435 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER MILLIS (DIRECTOR OF REGULATORY AFF): $229,717 total reported compensation
- MIKE CARPENTER (GENERAL COUNSEL): $213,824 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
An association of building professionals and related industries working together to provide safe and affordable housing for the people of North Carolina. We protect the american dream of home ownership through advocacy, education, and professional business development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through its programs and activities, the association encourages industry professionalism, provides a forum to consolidate industry views, and serves as a proactive advocate for the building industry which, through the assistance of nchba, provides homes for the citizens of North Carolina.nchba plays a key role in helping maintain consistently higher industry standards of conduct, quality, and ethics. Membership in nchba helps crystallize collective opinionsin order to effect change in congress, the n.c. General assembly, the courts and regulatory agencies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 102 of 102 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $490K · 109 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $138K reported
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.