North Carolina Coaches Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237423467
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Greensboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- (336) 379 9095
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $722,602
- Expenses
- $670,666
- Assets
- $1,950,214
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BUTCH CARTER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PHIL WEAVER (EXECUTIVE DI): $48,000 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH D FRANKS III (ASSISTANT): $42,000 total reported compensation
- EUGENE MORRIS (EXECUTIVE DI): $29,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The NCCA exists to promote and improve athletics in North Carolina’s public schools and to foster high standards of ethics and sportsmanship. Membership in the NCCA** **is available for full-time Certified Teachers and Teacher Assistants who are paid as a Coach, Athletic Director, or Licensed Athletic Trainer at a public school in North Carolina. For those coaches who do not meet membership requirements, Associate Status with the NCCA is available for those who coach, serve as AD, Athletic Trainer or First Responder at a public or private school in NC who may not teach but may be paid or work as a volunteer. In addition, anyone may attend the NC Coaching Clinic as a Clinic Attendee. The NCCA sponsors a large **Trade Show** in conjunction with the instructional sessions at the Coaching Clinic. Past Clinicians** : **2019 2020 2021.
What it reported doing in 2024
Arranging, holding, sponsoring and managing services to host all-star athletic games amoung North Carolina high schools and sports clinics for coaches. Grants and scholarships are provided to outstanding seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.91; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 70.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6347 of 6347 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $471K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.