North Carolina Adapted Sports Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881749879
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Cary, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9194142444
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $176,646
- Expenses
- $93,862
- Assets
- $376,015
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- William L Hall III (CEO)
- Yo Sobha (President)
- Dana Ben (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- William L Hall III (CEO)
- Yo Sobha (President)
- Dana Ben (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
North Carolina Adapted Sports provides adapted sports opportunities for people with a physical disability and advocates for access to an outdoor active lifestyle.
What it reported doing in 2025
North Carolina Adapted Sports provides the following adapted sports programming: Adapted Off-Road Cycling, Adapted Kayaking, Youth Wheelchair Basketball, Adapted Climbing and consultation on trail accessibility. NC Adapted Sports served 110 people with a physical disability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.6%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 63.2%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.01; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 62.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.6% of revenue deployed · 63.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.