North Canyon Medical Center Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820400986
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Gooding, ID, USA
Phone
2089349681
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,549
Expenses
$39,470
Assets
$87,412

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BILL CANINE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BILL CANINE (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLY MCCOOL (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SUSAN FAULKNER (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and enhance north canyon medical center (ncmc) by providing a vehicle for fundraising, gifts, and memorials whereby individuals and organizations can support current and ongoing needs in an effort to improve the healthcare of people in our region.

What it reported doing in 2013

North canyon medical center foundation raises funds to support north canyon medical center and general health programs in the community. The foundation distributed approximately 23,000 to the hospital during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.4%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 64.6%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.4%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.21; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 52.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.4% of revenue deployed · 64.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.