North American Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis Inc C/o Plazak Associates

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460647941
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6179482190
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Heart and Circulatory System Diseases, Disorders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,143
Expenses
$83,086
Assets
$143,416
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • RODNEY M CAMIRE (CHAIR)
  • KENNETH A BAUER (TREASURER)
  • WOLFGANG BERGMEIER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The north american society on thrombosis and hemostasis, inc., hereinafter referred to as "the society" is a regional professional society dedicated to the advancement of thrombosis and hemostasis research, education and clinical care. The society has a particular interest in attracting new scientists into the field, and supporting both early career and experienced clinicians and scientists by providing a regular scientific meeting for information exchange.

What it reported doing in 2018

We had three primary program activities in 2018: 1) supported the planning of the 2018 thrombosis & hemostasis summit of north america, held in march 2018. We assisted with speaker recruitment and program planning. 2) planned an educational meeting for about 75 early career investigators in conjunction with the hemostasis & thrombosis research society (htrs), held in march 2018. 3) continued our research fellowship program and supported three medical students for summer-long research projects in thrombosis and hemostasis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.4%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 44%; rating input score 44

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.4% of revenue deployed · 44% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.