North American Neuro-ophthalmology Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850342069
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roseville, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9526462037
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neurology, Neuroscience
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,233,093
- Expenses
- $1,612,122
- Assets
- $4,351,170
- Liabilities
- $776,014
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER QUIROS MD (PRESIDENT)
- HEATHER MOSS MD PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- MELISSA KO MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LARRY FROHMAN MD (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- PREM SUBRAMANIAN MD PHD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT/BOARD CHAIR)
- TAMARA KINVILLE-OSSIAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PETER QUIROS MD (PRESIDENT)
- HEATHER MOSS MD PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- MELISSA KO MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to achieving inclusive excellence in the care of patients with neuro-ophthalmic diseases by the support and promotion of equitable education, research, and the practice of neuro-ophthalmology.
What it reported doing in 2024
The north american neuro-ophthalmology society (nanos) is the only organization dedicated to the advancement of neuro-ophthalmologic education and information in north america. In march of 2024, nanos sponsored its 50th annual meeting, in honolulu, hi. The on-demand content of our meeting was available for almost 6 months after our in-person meeting, till september 30. The educational meeting includes symposia, workshops, hands-on training, platform and poster presentations, and discussion of cases and best practices in neuro-ophthalmic research, basic science, and patient care.nanos uses multiple data sources to measure the impact of its educational activities on learners and on the discipline of neuro-ophthalmology. These measures reflect professionals' need to examine current practices, evaluate the appropriateness of educational activities in order to improve their levels of knowledge of neuro-ophthalmology basic science and clinical practice, competence in diagnosing and treating neuro-ophthalmic disease, and performance in diagnosing and treating neuro-ophthalmic diseases.the society recognizes outstanding work and provides best abstract awards for platform and poster presentations at the annual meeting by a resident, student or fellow. The society gives a distinguished service award at the discretion of the executive board to those who have provided a sustained and substantial service to the north american neuro-ophthalmology society.nanos gives a young investigator award. This award was established to encourage and recognize basic or clinical research in neuro-ophthalmology by a nanos candidate or active member. The originality, scientific merit and neuro-ophthalmic interest of a development investigator's total body of work combined with a representative new research manuscript will be considered as criteria to determine the award recipient.nanos recognizes the need to stimulate investigator-initiated research programs in neuro-ophthalmology. The nanos pilot research grant program provides a one-year, non-renewable source of funding to help principal investigators generate preliminary data that will lead to additional funding from other national agencies or foundations. Nanos recognizes the need to stimulate leadership development in diverse members of its community. The dr. Ivy dreizin leadership development grant provides a onetime, nonrenewable source of funding to support leadership development for a nanos member. Priority is given to those who have been actively involved in the women in neuroophthalmology committee and nanos. Nominees and alternates are selected by the women in neuroophthalmology steering committee, subject to approval by the nanos board of directors.the society has its own journal, the journal of neur0-ophthalmology.nanos members are provided with an opportunity to join an e-mail scientific discussion group.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.3%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.6%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.7; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.3% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $578K reported
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.