North America Taiwanese Professors Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363225568
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Naperville, IL, USA
Phone
6307181883
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,397
Expenses
$75,713
Assets
$354,511
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Chih-Ping Yeh (Executive Director)
  • Yao-Yuan Yeh (President)
  • Ying Po Robin Liao (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Chih-Ping Yeh (Executive Director)
  • Yao-Yuan Yeh (President)
  • Ying Po Robin Liao (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1. To promote scientific and professional knowledge and its utilization. 2.To facilitate international understanding, educational exchange, and cultural contact among people in Taiwan, the United States, and other countries. 3. To sponsor scholarly research and education on subjects related to Taiwan. 4.To further the general welfare of Taiwanese communities in North America. Host annual conferences, webinars, and special speeches online/in-person meetings.

What it reported doing in 2024

Professional ST Liao Memorial Award and Research Fund a Memorial Award:$30,000.00 b Research Award:$12,000.00 Young Scholar Travel Support: $4000.00

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.7%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.68; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.7% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.