North America & New Zealand Institute for Bioenergetic Analysis Inc a PBC
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873554599
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Poway, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8587480410
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $410
- Expenses
- $759
- Assets
- $9,014
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Janet S Parker (President)
- Terry Hunt (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Janet S Parker (President)
- James Elniski (Chairman)
- Terry Hunt (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The North America and New Zealand Institute for Bioenergetic Analysis (NANZIBA) is a regional organization of local Bioenergetic Analysis Institutes. Bioenergetic Analysis is a theoretical approach to psychotherapy that focuses on the mind, body, and the energy flowing between them, and is based on the premise that the mind and body function as one. Though considered a humanistic approach by some individuals, the approach is rooted in psychoanalysis and makes use of relational therapy, physical body work, and body expression analysis.The purpose of NANZIBA is to educate the public and licensed psychotherapists about Bioenergetic Analysis, assist local institutes with their educational programs, and to interface with those local institutes and the International Institute for Bioenergetic Analysis (IIBA.) NANZIBA maintains a social media presence, supports educational workshops for both the public and licensed psychotherapists regarding Bioenergetic Analysis, facilitates communication be
What it reported doing in 2020
NANZIBA assists local institutes in providing information to the general population about the benefits of Bioenergetic Analysis. An informative session and workshop was planned for November 2020, to be held again after Covid 19 restrictions are lifted. NANZIBA was incorporated in 2020. As such we do not have many past activities to describe. Current activities include posting to social media to assist in raising awareness about our psychotherapeutic approach, providing financial support to local institutes for educational programs, maintaining our website, and communicating with local institutes and the International Institute for Bioenergetic Analysis. Our social media volunteer is responsible for posting on social media each month and maintaining a list serve of all of our members; Our secretary is responsible for overseeing website updates; and each executive committee member is responsible for communicating between NANZIBA and local institutes. Each of these activities is ongoing as needed. These activities began when we were a small informal group of volunteers and continues today.NANZIBA volunteer members developed our website when we were an informal group of volunteers and before we had any income. NANZIBA began posting on social media sites in 2020. Each month our social media volunteer posts information about workshops, education programs, conferences, and newly published articles or books from local institutes or members. The publication of these activities contributes to the public and licensed therapists knowledge by attending these events and thus promotes information about our therapeutic approach.NANZIBA has provided financial support for local workshops to promote Bioenergetic Analysis to psychotherapists and the general public which furthers our educational goals. NANZIBA communicates about scholarly articles and books authored by our members through both the website and our list serve. The list serve also facilitates communication between individual members on topics related to bioenergetic analysis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 54%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -85.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.88; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 54% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $410 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.