Normaleah Ovarian Cancer Initiative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262976159
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Bettendorf, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3097940009
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cancer Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,967
- Expenses
- $96,566
- Assets
- $97,307
- Liabilities
- $63
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JODIE S KAVENSKY (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO)
- ALLISON KILFOY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JODIE S KAVENSKY (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO)
- MARGARET ORTIZ (SECRETARY)
- HANA STRICKLER (FORMER TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Normaleah ovarian cancer initiative is a non-profit corporation with a mission of creating hope for families throughout their cancer journey by empowering them with knowledge, advocacy and a supportive community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Beat the big o campaign: see schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.9%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 36%; rating input score 36
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.9% of revenue deployed · 36% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.