Nordic Ski Club of Milwaukee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237302725
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Muskego, WI, USA
Phone
4146880481
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,311
Expenses
$46,517
Assets
$20,086
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Carol Doebler (President)
  • Ellen Riley (Vice President)
  • Renee Couture (2nd Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Carol Doebler (President)
  • Ellen Riley (Vice President)
  • Renee Couture (2nd Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Primary Purpose: Organize and conduct cross-country ski trips, clinics and general activities for members and guests. Secondary purpose: Collect and distribute donations for outdoor related activity-related organizations and charities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Nordic Ski Club of Milwaukee conducted 3 cross-country ski trips to northern Wisconsin, and Michigan. Donations totaling $1,600 were made to the following 501(c)(3) organizations who promote cross-country skiing; Anderson Bluff & River Trail Foundation Inc, Friends of Valley Spur, Swedetown Trails Club, Hancock Trails Club (DBA Keweenaw Nordic Ski Club) and WI Nordic Network.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.