Nor Cal Stunt Officials Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932472241
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Lincoln, CA, USA
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,856
- Expenses
- $92,478
- Assets
- $7,105
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Anahid Arrieta (President)
People named in this filing
- Anahid Arrieta (President)
- Monica Biggs (Treasurer and Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of NCSOA is to promote officiating recruit new members educate and provide training at the highest level. NCSOA conducted 2 virtual and multiple in-person training sessions for its members. Additionally NCSOA managed scheduling assigning and payment for more than 50 Sport of Stunt officials at over 300 youth and high school games in Northern California during the fiscal year in question.
What it reported doing in 2024
NCSOAs second program service is the training of Stunt officials. NCSOA conducted four virtual hour-long trainings and two in-person sessions to offer Northern California officials the latest information on Stunt. Board members collaborated with National Stunt Officials and USA Cheer to align the training with national standards and regulations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 89.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.