Noor-Ul-Iman School
Legal name: Noor-ul-iman Schools Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223249506
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Monmouth Junction, NJ, US
- Phone
- 732-329-1800
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,883,117
- Expenses
- $8,350,977
- Assets
- $8,951,067
- Liabilities
- $2,661,370
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NASIR HASAN (PRESIDENT)
- NOOR ROSTOUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TAMMY ELMANSOURY (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $123,220 total reported compensation
- ABIER BAYNUR (BUSINESS MANAGER): $108,996 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster future generations in a nurturing environment based on core Islamic values and instilling the love of Allah, the Quran and the Prophet (ﷺ) by Developing Character, Living Faith, Inspiring Leadership, Pursuing Knowledge, Serving and Building Community and Achieving Excellence. Noor-Ul-Iman School's vision is to illuminate a way of life that fosters strong and confident leaders guided by Islamic values and a moral compass to prepare them for success in this world and the next. Our Mission To foster future generations in a nurturing environment based on core Islamic values and instilling the love of Allah, the Quran, and the Prophetﷺ by Developing Character, Living Faith, Inspiring Leadership, Pursuing Knowledge, Serving and Building Community, and Achieving Excellence.
What it reported doing in 2024
School offers fulltime elementary education to high school education to over 500 students from pre-k to 12th grade. The program includes academic and religious curriculum.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 62.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 15 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $476K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.