Noor Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
393673851
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Charlotte CH, VA, USA
Phone
4345097487
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,353
Expenses
$58,244
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$3,591

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Khadija Bint-Abdus Salaam (Director (Head of Schools))
  • Amatullah Rauf (Director (Vice Principal))
  • Syeda Zainab Gillani (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Noor Academy operates as an educational institution dedicated to providing comprehensive K-12 instruction that integrates academic excellence with Islamic values, fostering the intellectual, spiritual, and personal development of students. The organization's purpose is to cultivate well-rounded scholars who actively seek knowledge, demonstrate strong moral character, and are prepared to become responsible leaders and contributing global citizens.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, Noor Academy continued to advance its mission of providing high-quality, values-based education by strengthening its academic programs and student support services. The school maintained strong student achievement outcomes while integrating character development and Islamic studies into its curriculum. Noor Academy also expanded community engagement through events, parent involvement initiatives, and partnerships that enhanced the overall educational experience. Additionally, the institution sustained its commitment to developing well-rounded students prepared for academic success and responsible leadership in their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.