Non Profit Tech

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522129444
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Madison, WI, USA
Phone
6082413616
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,951
Expenses
$83,420
Assets
$1,517

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nonprofit Tech is a national, not-for-profit technology association providing information, education, research, and technology services to the nonprofit and public sectors. With the concomitant mission of providing economic opportunity to disenfranchised communities through entrepreneurship; Nonprofit Tech supports mission-critical and programmatic efforts of the public organizations through education and service.

What it reported doing in 2011

Data and Information Services. Design and development of relational databases, data retrieval systems, data cleaning, and data analysis of research, education, and information dispersal for nonprofit and public organizations across the United States; tackling issues from adolescent mortality to low income housing to sustainable communities. Processing over 8.2 million records, 475 tables, and 36 relational database solutions, with provisional access to over 250,000 users-general public, nonprofit and educational organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -89.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 10 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.